Tuesday, February 7, 2017
The Insidiousness of Shariah
From an analysis of Islamic Shariah by a team of researchers:
Shariah dictates a comprehensive and totalitarian system of laws, an aggressive military doctrine, an all-encompassing socio-economic program and a ruthless enforcement mechanism. It is, in short, a complete way of life. It is against this backdrop that the obligation shariah demands of its followers – namely, to conduct a global campaign to replace non-Muslim governments with Islamic States governed by Islamic law, to conquer Dar al-Harb (the House of War) for Dar al-Islam (the House of Islam) – must be seen as an illegal effort to supplant our Constitution with another legal code, not a religious practice protected by that document. Islamic scholar Majid Khadduri put it this way: “It follows that the existence of a Dar al-Harb is ultimately outlawed under the Islamic jural order; that the dar al-Islam is permanently under jihad obligation until the Dar al-Harb is reduced to nonexistence; and that any community accepting certain disabilities – must submit to Islamic rule and reside in the dar al-Islam or be bound as clients to the Muslim community. The universalism of Islam, in its all-embracing creed, is imposed on the believers as a continuous process of warfare, psychological and political if not strictly military.”
Yet, many in this country – particularly in governmental, academic, and media elites – have shown themselves susceptible to the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy for waging sabotage against the United States in order to destroy “its miserable house…by their own hand.” They are enabling shariah’s spread by enforcing a tolerance of that doctrine under the rubric of freedom of religion and diversity, instead of recognizing it for the seditious and anti-constitutional agenda it openly espouses.
In the words of Muslim scholar Shamim Siddiqi: “The movement may also seek legal protection from the court for fundamental human rights to propagate what its adherents believe to be correct and to profess the same through democratic, peaceful and constitutional means.” (Emphasis added.)
Recent research indicates that in many mosques across the country the overthrow of the U.S. Constitution is being encouraged in the printed material offered on-site or in the textbooks used in children’s classes, if not directly from the Friday pulpit.
In addition, the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial in Dallas, Texas, provided evidence that the majority of Islamic organizations in America are affiliates of or associated with the Muslim Brotherhood in some way and many of them are raising funds for jihad. The convictions of all defendants in that case make clear that such behavior is not protected by the First Amendment. And yet, American elites still deal with shariah as just a religious system, when in fact it is as totalitarian a political program as ever were those of communism, fascism, National Socialism, or Japanese imperialism.
Military historians and combat veterans understand that it is far easier to defend against an attack that comes from an enemy outside one’s defensive perimeter. In that case, the defending army need only train its fire outwards and have no fear of fratricide. By contrast, the most difficult attack to defend against is the one that comes from inside the defensive perimeter, because distinguishing the enemy from friendly forces is problematic. That is the situation in America today. We have an enemy inside our perimeter. But for this nation, the challenge is not just an inability to distinguish friend from foe. Rather, it is an unwillingness to do so.
Excerpt from Shariah: The Threat To America: An Exercise In Competitive Analysis (Report of Team B II). Patrick Poole, Joseph E. Schmitz, William J Boykin, Harry Edward Soyster, Henry Cooper, Michael Del Rosso, Frank J. Gaffney Jr., John Guandolo, Clare M. Lopez, Andrew C.. McCarthy. Center for Security Policy Press.
The insinuation of members of the Muslim Brotherhood into many levels of our government is setting America up for conquest by a system of jihad solely intended to transform our country into becoming part of the Islamic Caliphate. Under the Obama administration, the door was opened wide based on the practice of taqqiya (deception through outright lies), a basic principle of Islam.
Note that Team B II revealed that Islam under Shariah is not just a religious ideology that must be protected under our Constitution, but is rather to be avoided. Quoting from the Team B II report, “American elites still deal with shariah as just a religious system, when in fact it is as totalitarian a political program as ever were those of communism, fascism, National Socialism, or Japanese imperialism.”
Political correctness is aiding our enemies!