A number of UN initiatives suggest that the international body views itself as the foundation of a one-world government for the planet.
America is gradually increasing its involvement in these initiatives.
One example of this is the shocking testimony
yesterday (March 7, 2012) by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta at a Senate Armed
Services Committee congressional hearing during which it was confirmed that the
U.S. government is now completely beholden to international power structures and
that the legislative branch is a worthless relic.
Paul Watson reported in a PrisonPlanet blog:
During the hearing yesterday Panetta and Joint Chiefs of
Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey brazenly admitted that their authority comes
not from the U.S. Constitution, but that the United States is subservient to
and takes its marching orders from the United Nations and NATO, international
bodies over which the American people have no democratic influence.
Panetta was asked by Senator Jeff Sessions, “We spend our
time worrying about the U.N., the Arab League, NATO and too little time, in my
opinion, worrying about the elected representatives of the United States. As
you go forward, will you consult with the United States Congress?”
The Defense Secretary responded “You know, our goal would
be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and
inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would
want to get permission from the Congress.”
President Barack Obama had based part of his
election platform on seeking world consensus before engaging in armed conflict.
It seems few believed that he was genuinely intending to expose United States
interests to the whims of the remainder of the world, many of whom are
vehemently opposed to our democratic methods and formerly-successful economy.
Just as Hitler bamboozled the nation of
Germany between the First and Second World Wars, so Obama has blinded our nation
to his intention to push us into the realization of a new socialist state
governed by himself as the sole arbiter of what’s right and the bypassing of
Congress with its subsequent destruction of our Constitutional system of checks
and balances. Obama said he would do this, but few believed him.
See the Connect
the Dots series.
The Independent
Sentinel reported in April this year that:
Under our Constitution, international treaties must be
approved by a 2/3rds vote of the Senate, but there is reason to believe that
Obama plans to implement the Law of the Sea
Treaty or LOST via Executive Order, flouting the Constitution.
This information was buried in a White House report. . . . On the White House
blog in March, President Obama stated “that the United States will promote
the stewardship and sustainable use of the oceans in several ways including by
cooperating and exercising leadership at the international level and pursuing
U.S. accession to the Law of the Sea Convention.”
Our President is on the verge of enforcing a treaty that
cedes the sovereignty of our oceans to the U.N. courts over which we have no
influence. We will also be required to pay one-half of all royalties from
off-shore oil drilling to this Marxist international body (the U.N. or its
appointed Council). It will be a win-win in Obama’s war on oil. Furthermore, we
as a “rich” nation must give away all our proprietary technology about
off-shore drilling. The international body will also decide where we can drill.
It’s insane!
The Law of the Sea Convention or Law of
the Sea Treaty (UNCLOS or LOST) establishes a legal regime for
navigation and international management of oceanic resources, including the
deep seabed.
This will do nothing for us but put us under the
jurisdiction of another bureaucracy and one which is governed by Marxist
philosophy. If LOST passes, we can suffer under world bureaucracies
as they steal our resources. They believe our wealth belongs to the world in
accordance with Marxist philosophy. . . . The LOST is so wrong for so many
reasons…
LOST operates under the assumption that any minerals in
the ocean floor constitute the “common heritage” of all mankind — and therefore
cannot be the property of any one individual, company, or nation.
This treaty is an affront to American national
sovereignty. It would give the United Nations authority over much of the world’s
oceans, including the power to regulate and tax deep-sea mining, and
redistribute the proceeds to Third World governments.
See the UN
Commission on the Rights of the Child for more information on a UN initiative
which would disarm the world. Historically, disarming populations has resulted
in enabling dictators to rule over and control their people to the detriment of
the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment